Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2002)

Population Ecology and Conservation of Baird’s Tapir (Tapirus bairdii) in the Lacandon Forest, Mexico

Submitted
25 May 2025
Published
2002-12-01

Abstract

Baird’s tapir (Tapirus bairdii) has an important role in the dynamics of tropical forests through herbivory, seed dispersal, and seed predation. This mammal has also been a food source for rural inhabitants of Mesoamerica. Tapirs are currently endangered due to habitat loss and over-hunting. The objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate the status of the tapir population in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (MABR) and its surroundings in the Lacandon Forest of Chiapas, Mexico; and (2) to propose a strategy for the conservation and management of tapirs in collaboration with residents of the study area. We walked 1908 km of line transects in the study area to count tapirs and their tracks. We interviewed 232 local hunters and had meetings with local communities to discuss our results. We observed 19 individuals and 438 tapir tracks between May 1998 and April 2001. Most tapir records (79.3%) were obtained in slightly hunted sites within MABR and only 0.4% were found outside this protected area. We estimated an overall encounter rate of 0.9 tapirs/100 km and a density of 0.22 ind/km2. Average density estimated in slightly hunted areas (0.24 ind/km2) was considerably higher than density of persistently hunted areas (0.05 ind/km2).  We estimated a two-month home range of 0.67 km2 for a radiocollared female tapir. The sex ratio based on hunting records at persistently hunted sites did not differ from the expected 1:1. From direct sightings, we estimated that the tapir population was composed of 78.9% adults (n=15), 15.8% juveniles (n=3), and 5.3% young (n=1). Using the roduction and the harvest models, we detected unsustainable hunting of tapirs at both regional and local levels in the study area. Through the stock-recruitment model, we estimated the status of the hunted tapir population at 21% of K. In order to promote tapir conservation in the study area, we recommend: (1) to protect remaining habitat within and outside existing reserves; (2) to encourage self-regulation of subsistence hunting by local communities; (3) to look for alternative sources of income for local people (e.g. tourism, and agro-forestry projects); (4) to establish environmental education and wildlife.

References

  1. Bodmer, R.E. 1995. Managing Amazonian wildlife: Biological correlates of game choice by detribalised hunters. Ecological Applications 5:872 877.
  2. Bodmer, R.E. 2001. Evaluating wildlife sustainable use in the Amazon: the unified harvest model. In: P. Sánchez, A. Morales & H.F López (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Wildlife Management in Amazonia and Latin America, p. 55. Fundación Natura, Bogotá, Colombia.
  3. Bodmer, R.E., Eisenberg, J.F. & Redford, K.H. 1997. Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals. Conservation Biology 11:460-466.
  4. Bodmer, R.E. & Robinson, J.G. (In press). Evaluating the sustainability of wildlife in the Neotropics. In: K. Silvius, R.E. Bodmer & J.M. Fragoso (eds.), People in Nature: Wildlife Conservation in the Neotropics. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
  5. Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. & Laake, J.L. 1993. Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman & Hall, London.
  6. Castillo, G. & Narave, H. 1992. Contribución al conocimiento de la vegetación de la Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Pp. 51-85. In: M.A. Vásquez & M.A. Ramos (eds.), Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona: Investigación para su Conservación. Publ. Esp. ECOSFERA no.1, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México.
  7. Conroy, M.J. 1996. Abundance indices. In: D.E. Wilson, F.R. Cole, J.D. Nichols, R. Rudran & M. Foster (eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals pp. 179-192. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  8. Cruz, E. 2001. Hábitos de Alimentación e Impacto de la Actividad Humana sobre el Tapir (Tapirus bairdii) en la Reserva de la Biosfera La Sepultura, Chiapas, México. M.S. Thesis, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México.
  9. Dimmick, R.W. & Pelton, M.R. 1994. Criteria of sex and age. In: T.A. Bookhout (ed.), Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats, pp. 169-214. Fifth edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  10. Eisenberg, J.F. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. I, The Northern Neotropics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
  11. Entwistle, A. & Dunstone, N. 2000. Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  12. Flesher, K. 1999. Preliminary notes on the conservation status of Baird´s tapir in north-eastern Honduras. Oryx 33:294-300.
  13. Fragoso, J.M. 1991. The effect of selective logging on Baird´s tapir. In: M.A. Mares & D.J. Schmidly (eds.), Latin American Mammalogy; History, Biodiversity and Conservation, pp.295-304. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK, USA.
  14. Foerster, C.R. 1998. Ambito de Hogar, Patrón de Movimientos y Dieta de la Danta Centroamericana (Tapirus bairdii) en el Parque Nacional Corcovado, Costa Rica. M.S. thesis, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE). 2000.
  15. Programa de Manejo, Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, México, D.F.
  16. IUCN. 2002. 2000 IUCN Red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. (http://www.redlist.org).
  17. March, I.J., Naranjo, E.J., Rodiles, R., Navarrete, D.A., Alba, M.P. & Hernández, P.J. 1996. Diagnóstico para la Conservation y Manejo de la Fauna Silvestre en la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas. Informe final para la Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, División de Conservation de la Biodiversidad. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas.
  18. Matola, S., Cuarón, A.D. & Rubio-Torgler, H. 1997. Status and action plan of Bird’s tapir (Tapirus bairdii). In: D.M. Brooks, R.E. Bodmer, and S. Matola (eds.). Tapirs: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan, pp. 29-45. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  19. Medellín, R.A. 1994. Mammal diversity and conservation in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Conservation Biology 8:780-799.
  20. Medici, P., & Valladares, C. 1997. Biologia e conservacao danta (Tapirus terrestris) no Parque Estadual Morro do Diablo, Sao Paulo, Brasil. Pp. 32-33 in: R.E. Bodmer (ed.), Proc. Third International Conf. of WildlifeManagement in Amazonia. Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.
  21. Montenegro, O.L. 1998. The Behavior of Lowland Tapir (Tapirus terrestris) at a Natural Mineral Lick in the Peruvian Amazon. M.S. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  22. Naranjo, E.J. 1995. Abundancia y uso de hábitat del tapir (Tapirus bairdii) en un bosque tropical húmedo de Costa Rica. Vida Silvestre Neotropical 4:20-31.
  23. Naranjo, E.J. 2002. Population ecology and conservation of ungulates in the Lacandon Forest, Mexico. Doctoral thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Naranjo, E.J. & Cruz, E. 1998. Ecología del tapir en la Reserva de la Biósfera La Sepultura. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 73:111 125.
  24. Naranjo, E.J., Rangel, J.L., Vásquez, I. & Hernández, H.G. 1997. Diagnóstico y plan de manejo para la fauna silvestre de la subregión Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas, México. Report to the Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas.
  25. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). 2000. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2000. Protección Ambiental, especies de Flora y Fauna Silvestres de México, Categorías de Riesgo y Especificaciones para su Inclusión, Exclusión o Cambio, y Lista de Especies en Riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación 488:1-61.
  26. Southwell, C. 1996. Estimation of population size and density when counts are incomplete. Pp. In: D.E. Wilson, F.R. Cole, J.D. Nichols, R.Rudran, & M. Foster (eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals, pp.193-210.
  27. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Thomas, L., Laake, J.L., Derry, J.F., Buckland, S.T., Borchers, D.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S.L., Burt, M.L., Marques, F., Pollard, J.H. & Fewster, R.M. 1998. Distance 3.5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment. University of St. Andrews, UK.
  28. Vásquez, M.A. & Ramos, M. 1992. Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules, Selva Lacandona: Investigación para su Conservación. Publ. Ocas. Ecosfera no.1. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México.
  29. White, G.C. & Garrott, R.A. 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radio-tracking Data. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 131

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.